the difficulty with a network like MSNBC, though, is that it can all too easily become an echo chamber. we want to be with like-minded people so badly that we forget that (especially as progressives, but definitely as americans) we are interested in rights for all ... not just rights for those we agree with. or rights that we think are important.
there's not often dissent in communities like #uppers or #inners, but i always appreciate it when it's there because that's when i know that we're having real discourse, and we're learning from one another, not just parroting ideas.
but i was reminded yesterday morning that not everyone thinks that way. the following is a storify of the exchanges i had, interspersed with my comments and interpretations of the situation.
i think i pretty much said everything above in the storify. i could further tease out the nuances of the exchange (for example, how i didn't attack him, or use words like "misogynistic," even though that would have been legit ... or how he framed me as an archetypal woman, and his attempts at constructing a positive exchange were completely founded in flattery and not substance ... or how he projected his own relentless behavior and emotionalism onto me.) but i won't go there. ;-) for now anyway.
i do think it's worth outlining what i think would have been the appropriate responses of someone whose tweet is pointed out as being anti-feminist:
- huh. i didn't think of it that way.
- interesting. i'll have to think more about that.
- wow. you're right. i'm going to delete that tweet
- thanks for pointing that out. i know that being male means that i have blindspots. thanks for helping me see them.
No comments:
Post a Comment